Showing posts with label Dalit politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dalit politics. Show all posts

Friday, 21 June 2024

Chandrashekhar’s victory from Nagina and the future of Dalit politics

 

Chandrashekhar’s victory from Nagina and the future of Dalit politics

by SR Darapuri

Nagina Lok Sabha seat of Uttar Pradesh is in the news because for the first time, Azad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram) President Chandrashekhar Azad has won from this seat. Chandrashekhar was pitted against BJP, BSP and alliance candidates. Chandrashekhar won by 1,51,473 votes. He got a total of 5,12,552 votes. BJP candidate got 3,61,079 votes, Samajwadi Party got 1,02,374 votes and BSP candidate got 13,272 votes. Thus, Chandrashekhar’s victory can be said to have been by a good margin.

The main reason for Chandrashekhar’s victory by a very good margin is the population mathematics of Nagina. Nagina is a reserved seat. The number of voters here is approximately 16 lakhs. It has about 46% Muslims and 21% Dalits and about 30% Chauhan, Saini and other backward class voters. There are five assembly constituencies in this Lok Sabha constituency, which include Nathaur, Najibabad, Nagina, Dhampur and Noorpur.

Earlier Nagina was a part of Bijnor Lok Sabha constituency, which later became Nagina Lok Sabha constituency after delimitation. Due to the high percentage of Muslims and Dalits, this Lok Sabha seat has been the centre of Dalit politics. Mayawati was elected MP from here as a BSP candidate in 1989, while Congress’s Meera Kumar won in 1985. BSP candidate Girish Chandra from the SP-BSP alliance won from this seat.

The main reason for Chandrashekhar’s victory on the Nagina seat has been the full support of Muslim voters and a large part of Dalit voters. Mayawati has considered this area as her stronghold, but this time Dalits and Muslims have voted for Chandrashekhar instead of voting for Mayawati with the aim of defeating BJP. That is why the BSP candidate got very few votes and came fourth.

Some people are considering Chandrashekhar’s victory as the beginning of a new Dalit politics, while Mayawati is continuously declining. It is worth considering that Chandrashekhar has neither any Dalit agenda nor any progressive ideology. The failure of Bahujan politics of Kanshiram that he talks about taking forward is in front of everyone and Mayawati is the biggest successor of Kanshiram. It will not be possible to defeat the Hindutva politics of BJP with only Dalit Muslim alliance. For this, a large democratic class alliance and an alternative pro-people economic policy is needed against the economic politics that is pro-corporate and fosters global finance capital. Therefore, our firm opinion is that Dalits should come out of the politics of identity and become a part of a large democratic class alliance in which the issues of Dalits, backward classes, minorities, tribals, laborers and farmers should be at the centre. It is worth considering that caste politics only strengthens Hindutva politics, defeating which is our main objective.

S R Darapuri, National President, All India People’s Front   

Saturday, 9 September 2023

Dr. Ambedkar, Sanatan Dharma and Dalit Politics

 

          Dr. Ambedkar, Sanatan Dharma and Dalit Politics

        S R Darapuri, National President, All India Peoples Front


At present, the entire country is discussing the remarks made by Udhayanidhi Stalin, son of Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin, in a meeting about Sanatana Dharma. In this, he has criticized the caste discrimination and system of high and low prevalent in Sanatan Dharma, compared it to a disease and has talked about eliminating it. BJP has projected it as an attack on Sanatan Dharma and a call for the genocide of 80% of Hindus. Regarding this, it has also called the opposition alliance 'India' as anti-Sanatan Dharma.

It seems that at present DMK in Tamil Nadu and BJP in North India are going to start politics in the name of Sanatan Dharma. In South India, the anti-Sanatan Dharma Dravidian movement had already been a vocal movement through which Periyar had mobilized the backward castes and driven out the Sanatani Brahmins from there. It seems that this statement of Udhayanidhi is to revive the politics of backward classes which has been defeated at the national level. It is known that in the past, Udhayanidhi's father MK Stalin, the present Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, has been making such efforts to mobilize the politics of social justice. This is DMK's next step in the same sequence. Similarly, BJP, which has already been doing politics of religion, wants to intensify the polarization of Hindu votes by showing a strong reaction to the opposition to Sanatan Dharma and by making Sanatani Hindus fear that religion is in danger and Sanatani Hindus are in danger.

In fact, the politics of Dravidian identity and Hindu identity is a major part of the old politics of these two parties. Even in Tamil Nadu, the anti-Brahmin movement has not been a movement to break the caste but has only been a movement to establish the supremacy of the backward classes. At present, Dalits are being subjected to maximum atrocities by the backward castes. There is tremendous caste discrimination against them. This makes it clear that the opposition of these castes to Brahmins (Sanatan Dharma) has been only a movement to gain power and not to eradicate castes. That is why Dr. Ambedkar, while criticizing their anti-Brahmin movement, had said, “It is not clear what is the difference between their ideology and Brahminical ideology. How much Brahminism is there in them? Their only objection is that the Brahmins consider them second class.” (“Dr. Ambekar on the Justice Party of Madras,” Thus Spoke Ambedkar Vol I, by Bhagwan Das, page 107-109) That is why power in Tamil Nadu came into the hands of non-Brahmins but there was no difference in the social system, especially in the condition of Dalit castes. They have not even created any alternative non-Brahminical ideology/system. In North India, Sanatan Dharma has been a proponent of caste discrimination and the system of upper and lower caste for centuries and even today BJP is in favour of maintaining the same Sanatan system. RSS preaches to maintain this system as it is through the formula of harmony.

It is well known that Dr. Ambedkar has called Sanatan Dharma, Brahmin Dharma, Vedic Dharma and Hindu Dharma as synonyms of each other. He also said, “Anyone who has fully understood Brahminism need not be sad. For Brahmins, religion is just a cover for doing politics of greed and selfishness. Brahminism has ruined the Hindu society.” (Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Ancient India, p. 247) That is why Dr. Ambedkar favoured the destruction of the caste system propounded by Sanatan Dharma and not Sanatan Dharma. For this, for Hindu social reform, he launched the Mahad Talab Movement for the use of untouchables and the Kale Ram Mandir Entry Movement for them, but due to strong opposition from Sanatani Hindus, he did not get any success. Ultimately, being disappointed with this, he left Hinduism and accepted Buddhism. He not only gave Buddhism as an alternative but also created alternative politics. For this, the Independent Labour Party, Scheduled Castes Federation and Republican Party of India formed by him also had a revolutionary agenda through which they wanted to ensure the economic, educational and political development of Dalits, workers, farmers and women. But what is the difference between the economic policy of DMK and BJP? Does DMK have any program of caste annihilation? Therefore, instead of doing politics in the name of religion, shouldn't the so-called attackers and defenders  of Sanatan Dharma come forward to eradicate the social evils prevalent in Sanatan Dharma like the caste system, as Gandhiji did? But RSS/BJP do not seem to have any intention of doing so and neither does DMK.

In the above situation, when in the name of opposing Sanatan Dharma and BJP in the name of protecting it, DMK and BJP are only doing the politics of religious polarization and diverting attention from the real issues of the people, then what should the political parties doing secular pro-people politics do? In such a situation, it is necessary that these political parties should bring the major threats and challenges facing the country to the centre of politics. The biggest threat to the current politics is the nexus of global finance capital, corporate and Hindutva forces, without defeating which it will not be possible to save democracy and the indigenous economy. Along with this, society and institutions will have to be democratized to destroy the remnants of Brahmanical feudalism. But it is also a tragedy that even the mainstream political parties are playing politics only to get power. There is no fundamental difference visible between their policies and the current policies of the BJP.

Nowadays, this fashion has started, especially in social media, that people who neither understand Dr. Ambedkar in the true sense nor use his ideas in any particular field, club Periyar, Jotiba Phule, Dr. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram in the same breath are engaged in an anti-caste campaign. Dr. Ambedkar neither accepted the thesis of Tamil Backward Castes nor their ideology nor did the so-called Bahujan politics of Kanshi Ram and Mayawati have any place in it. The basic question is the annihilation of caste and without an all-round democratic agenda and its carrying power, caste cannot be destroyed nor can a new human being be born. In this context, without being prejudiced, a lot can be learned from the struggle of Periyar, Ambedkar, Mahatma Gandhi, and the Communist and Socialist movements to create a casteless society.

Therefore, it is necessary to defeat the nexus of global finance capital, corporate and Hindutva forces, defeat BJP, save democracy and indigenous economy, stop unemployment, agricultural crisis and MSP and privatization, democratize society and institutions and promote class politics. Pro-people, secular and progressive forces should be brought together on one platform by making a common minimum program and the opposition alliance 'India' should also be motivated by this. All India Peoples Front has been working on this for a long time. A new experiment of All India Peoples Front is going on at present, not only that of the communist and socialist movements but also of Anand Teltumbde, who like me served jail without committing any crime and who interprets the relevance of Dr. Ambedkar to present times., his ideas can be incorporated and taken forward. I hope that the true friends of social justice will not take my views differently and instead of strengthening the BJP by getting involved in unnecessary debates, they will develop their principles and field of work. This is the opinion of me and my national political unit (All India Peoples Front).

 

Saturday, 21 May 2022

Bahujan politics needs a New Radical Alternative

 

Bahujan politics needs a New Radical Alternative

             - S R Darapuri, National President, All India People's Front

Dr. Ambedkar is considered the father of Dalit politics. He raised the demand for political rights to the Dalits in the Round Table Conferences and despite Gandhiji's strong opposition, the Dalits got the status of a minority class and political rights apart from the Hindus, which were announced in the form of Communal Award. In this, Dalits got the right of separate electorates to choose their own representatives like other minorities like Sikhs and Muslims. Gandhiji opposed it by fasting till death by calling it a conspiracy to divide Hindu society and in the end Dr. Ambedkar had to sign Poona to save Gandhiji's life. Due to this, instead of separate electorates, the Dalits got the facility of reserved seats in the legislature, reservation in government jobs and local bodies and special incentive for education, but the right of independent politics of the Dalits was snatched away.

Dr. Ambedkar formed the Independent Labour Party (Swatantra Mazdoor Party) and participated in the Bombay Presidency in the first election of 1937. His main emphasis in this election was on the issues of the working class. In this they won 15 seats including 3 general seats. After this he formed the All India Scheduled Castes Federation  (SCF) in 1942, whose membership was limited to Dalits only. With this, he contested elections in 1946 and 1952 but he did not get any special success. Finally, on October 14, 1956, he dissolved the Federation and founded the Republican Party of India (RPI). He also framed its constitution.

Now it remains to be seen what was the main vision of Babasaheb behind forming these parties. Let us first look at Babasaheb's Swatantra Mazdoor Party. Dr. Ambedkar, in his statement, while explaining the reasons for the formation of the party and its work, had said- “Keeping in view that today is not the time to organize parties on the basis of sectarianism. Agreeing with the wishes of my friends, the name of the party and its program have been made huge so that political cooperation with other sections of the people can be possible. The main focus of the party will remain only 15 members of the Dalit castes, but people from other classes will also be able to join the party. The politics of this party was not casteist but class and issue based and mainly Dalits were at its centre.

If we look at the purpose and agenda of the All India Scheduled Castes Federation established by Babasaheb in 1942, it is found that Dr. Ambedkar had talked about establishing it as a third party to strike a balance between the ruling Congress and the socialist parties. Its membership was limited to the Depressed Classes only as it was necessary at that time to project the interests of the Depressed Classes.

Babasaheb formed the Republican Party of India (RPI) on October 14, 1956, whose main objective was to create a party that would be according to the promises made in the constitution and its objective was to fulfill them. He did not want to make it a party of untouchables only because a party formed in the name of one caste or class cannot get power. It can only become a pressure group. The main objectives behind the establishment of the RPI were: (1) To remove inequalities from the social system so that no privileged and deprived sections remain, (2) There should be a two-party system: one is the opposite party in power, (3) Equality before the law and there should be same law for all, (4) establishment of moral values ​​in the society, (5) equal treatment to minority people, (6) sense of humanity which has been lacking in Indian society.

The main goal and objective of the party in the preamble of the party's constitution was to achieve "Justice, Liberty, Equality and Fraternity". The program of the party was very wide. Babasaheb's objective behind the establishment of the party was that minority people, poor Muslims, poor Christians, poor and lower caste Sikhs and untouchables of weaker sections, people of backward castes, people of primitive castes, end of exploitation, seeking justice and progress. May all the people of India unite under one flag and stand against the capitalists and defend the Constitution and their rights.” - (Dalit Politics and Organization - Bhagwan Das)

It is clear from the above description that the objective of the political parties founded by Babasaheb was to create a multi-class party which could include Dalits, Backward, Muslims, Workers and Peasants. The agenda of the party was also made on the issues of these sections. The agenda of his parties was not casteist at all.

Now if we look at the current Dalit politics, then politics in the name of Bahujan comes to the fore. Its main father is Kanshi Ram. Kanshi Ram's concept of Bahujan was from an alliance of Dalit, Muslim and other backward castes whom he considered to be 85% of the total population of India and the remaining 15% as upper castes. Hence his Bahujan politics is also known as 15 vs 85. His main agenda was to snatch political power from 15% of the upper castes. This formula sounds great but in practice it is not. The leadership in Kanshi Ram's Bahujan politics was in the hands of the elite people of Dalits, Backward and Muslims. They used to get tickets on the basis of access/money and by winning they became ministers, MLAs and MPs. When the government was formed, it was they who used to take maximum advantage of it. Common Dalits, OBCs and Muslims were only the voters who voted vigorously in the hope that their problems would be resolved if the government was formed. But even after the formation of the BSP government four times, there was no improvement in their material conditions.

The main objective of Bahujan politics was to either capture or share political power. Its policies or agenda were not to replace the policies or agenda of the politics of the present exploiting class. Although Kanshi Ram had given the slogan of change of system, but when he came to power, he did not do anything for it. In fact, he had no alternative policies or agenda of his own which would uplift the common man (Dalit, Backward or Minority or others). The pivot of Bahujan politics was the section of the Depressed Classes who entered government jobs, whose biggest issue was reservation. Therefore, the main agenda of Bahujan politics was also reservation, promotion and good posting etc. Land allotment, employment, education, health and freedom from oppression were not in his agenda for the common Dalit. With Mayawati becoming the Chief Minister four times, they were emotionally appeased and there was some reduction in harassment too, but there was no major change in their condition. In fact, Bahujan politics had no capacity to fight Hindutva and pro-corporate politics and it was bound to decline.

In comparison to Kanshi Ram's Bahujan politics, if Dr. Ambedkar's politics is seen, then at its centre were poor Dalits, poor backward, poor Muslims, labourers and poor farmers. Babasaheb in his Agra speech had expressed deep concern over the landlessness of the Dalits and talked about fighting for getting them land. His aim was to unite these people under the banner of one party and fight for their constitutional rights by raising them against the capitalists and Brahmanism. The main goal of Kanshi Ram was to get power by any means, for which he also took three-time support from the staunch anti-Dalit BJP, due to which Bahujan politics got confused and headed towards its downfall.

Babasaheb had created the Republican Party of India as a big platform in which apart from the Dalits, people from other sections could also participate. Through this, Babasaheb was creating an alternative politics in which the common man was at the centre. The main objective of the party was to create a party which is according to the promises made in the constitution and its objective is to fulfil them. Initially, when the party worked towards these objectives and agenda, it also got very good success in the elections of 1962 and 1967. It also led a huge land movement in 1964-65, which led to the allotment of land to the Dalits. Later this party got divided due to personal interest of some leaders, behind which Congress had a big hand. Congress broke its leaders with the lure of post and now it is divided into many pieces and is ineffective. Nowadays the leaders of Dalit parties also keep changing parties like this for personal gains.

At present, the main representative of Bahujan politics is considered to be the Bahujan Samaj Party. Apart from this, there is Ramdas Athawale's RPI (A) in Maharashtra and Ram Vilas Paswan's Lok  Janshakti Party in Bihar which has alliance with BJP. The agenda of all these parties is only to get power or share in power. They have no policy or agenda different from the ruling party BJP or Congress. That is why they cannot compete with BJP's Hindutva and pro-corporate politics. In these parties, democracy is replaced by authoritarianism and the leadership is in the hands of one person. There is no interference of common man in this. That is why their leaders make alliances with anyone for personal gain, which does not benefit the common man. Dr. Ambedkar had said that political power is the key to all problems. He had further said that political power should be used for the development of the society but the conduct of leaders of Bahujan politics is completely opposite.

Therefore, in view of the above circumstances, in place of the present Bahujan politics, there is a need to develop a new politics of Dalits, backwards and minorities, whose policies and agenda are against the Hindutva and corporate politics of BJP and the attack of global capital. For this, alternative policies like making employment a fundamental right, making education universal, improving health services, stopping privatization, making agriculture profitable, allotting land to the landless, ending corporate monopoly, restoration of democracy, ending black laws and the need for secularism etc. Along with this, democratization of society in which the destruction of caste is prominent also needs to be implemented. The present politics of caste is the promoter of Hindutva itself. Therefore, instead of this, the politics of public issues should be adopted.

Keeping this need of Bahujan politics in view, we formed the All India People's Front in 2013. In the leadership of this party, prominence has been given to Dalits, Adivasis, minorities, most backward and women. Its main goal is to give an embodiment of the concept of Begumpura of Sant Ravidas. This party is in favour of secularism and democracy. Our effort is to create a multi-class party so that intellectuals, social workers and parties of different ideologies can be included in it and with their help the attack of  Hindutva and corporate backed  BJP/RSS and the totalitarianism of financial capital can be stopped. It should be remembered that in the absence of alternative policies and agenda, the present Bahujan politics has failed miserably in this. Therefore, now Bahujan politics needs a new radical alternative.

Let us together honestly build a multi-class politics that can withstand the onslaught of BJP's Hindutva, pro-corporate politics and global finance capital and can fulfill Dr. Ambedkar's dream of establishing a casteless and classless society.

       

 

 

 

RADICAL: Marx, Marxism and the Indian Context

RADICAL: Marx, Marxism and the Indian Context : Marx, Marxism and the Indian Context   The principles of Marxism and the Indian communi...