Unpublished Preface to
Buddha and His Dhamma: A Book by Dr. Ambedkar
A
question is always asked to me how I happen to take such high degree of
education. Another question is being asked why I am inclined towards Buddhism.
These questions have been asked because I was born in the community known as
the ‘Untouchables.’ This preface is not the place for answering the first
question. But this preface may be the place for answering the second question.
This conviction has grown in me after thirty years of close study of all
religions.
How
I was led to study Buddhism is another story. It may be interesting for the
readers to know. This is how it happened.
My
father was a military officer but at the same time a very religious person. He
brought me up under a strict discipline. From my early age I found certain
contradictions in my father’s religious way of life. He was a Kabirpanthi
though his was a Ramanandi. As such he
did not believe in Murti Puja (Idol Worship) and he performed Ganapati Puja of course for our sake but I did not like it.
He read the books of Ramayna and Mahabharta to my sister and other persons who
assembled at my father’s house to hear the Katha. This went on for a long
number of years.
The
year I passed the English Fourth Examination community people wanted to
celebrate the occasion by holding a public meeting to congratulate me. Compared
to the state of education in other communities this was hardly an occasion for
celebration. But it was felt by the organisers that as I was the first boy in
my community to reach this stage. They thought I had reached a great height.
They went to my father to ask for his permission. My father flatly refused
saying such a thing would inflate the boy. After all he has only passed the
examination and nothing more. Those who wanted to celebrate the occasion were
disappointed. They went to Dada Keluskar, a personal friend of my father and asked him
to intervene. He agreed. After a little argumentation my father yielded and the
meeting was held. Dada Keluskae presided. He was a literary person of his time.
At the end of his address he gave me as gift a copy of his book on the life of
the Buddha which he had written for the Baroda Sayajirao Oriental Series. I read
the book with great interest and was greatly impressed and moved by it.
I began to ask why my father did not introduce
us to Buddhist literature. After this I
was determined to ask my father this question. One day I asked my father why he
insisted upon our reading the Mahabharta and Ramayana which recounted the
greatness of the Brahmins and the Kshatriyas and repeated the stories of the
degradation of the Shudras and the Untouchables. My father did not like the
question. He merely said, “You must not ask
such silly questions. You are only a boy; you must do as you are told.”
My
father was a Roman Patriarch and exercised most extensive Patria Protestas over
his children. I alone could take a little liberty with him and that was because
my mother had died in my childhood leaving me to the care of my aunty. So after
some time I asked again the same question. This time my father had evidently
prepared for the reply. He said, “The reason why I ask you to read the Ramayana
and Mahabharta is this. We belong to the Untouchables and you are likely to develop
an inferiority complex which is natural. The value of Ramayana and Mahabharta
lies in removing this inferiority complex. See Drona and Karna. They were small
men but to what heights they rose? Look
at Valmiki. He was a Koli. But he became the author of Ramayana. It is for
removing this inferiority complex that I ask you to read the Mahabharta and
Ramayana.” I could see that there was
some force in my father’s arguments. But I was not satisfied. I told my father
that I did not like any of the figures in Mahabharta. I said,“I do not like
Bhishma and Drona nor Krishna. Bhishma
and Drona were hypocrites. They said one thing and did quite the other thing.
Krishna believed in frauds. Equal dislike I have for Vali-Sugriva episode and
his (Rama’s) beastly behaviour towards Sita,” My father was silent and made no
reply. He knew that there was revolt.
This
is how I turned to the Buddha with the help of the book given to me by Dada
Keluskar. It was not with an empty mind that I went to the Buddha at that early
age. I had a background and in reading the Buddhist Lore I could always compare
and contrast. This is the origin of my interest in the Buddha and his Dhamma.
The
urge to write this book has a different origin. In 1951 the Editor of the
Mahabodhi Society’s Journal of Calcutta asked me to write an article for the
Vaishakha Number. In that article I argued that the Buddha’s Religion was the
only religion which a society awakened by science could accept without which it
would perish. I also mentioned that for the modern world Buddhism makes slow
advance due to the fact that its literature is so vast that no one can read the
whole of it. That it has no such thing as a Bible, as the Christians have is its
greatest handicap. On the publication of this article I received many calls
written and oral to write such a book. It is in response to these calls that I
have undertaken the task.
To
disarm all criticism I would like to make it clear that I claim no originality
for the book. It is a compilation and assembly plant. The material has been gathered from various
books. I would particularly mention Ashavaghosha’s “Buddhacharita.” whose
poetry no one can excel. In the narrative of certain events I have borrowed his
language.
The
only originality that I can claim in the order of presentation of the topics in
which I have tried to introduce is simplicity and clarity. There are certain
matters which give headache to the students of Buddhism I have dealt with them
in the introduction.
It
remains for me to express my gratitude to those who have been helpful to me. I am very grateful to Mr. Nanak Chand Rattu of
village Sakrauli and Mr. Parksh Chand of village Nagla Khurd in the district of
Hoshiarpur (Punjab) for the burden they have taken upon themselves to type the
manuscript. They have done it several times. Shri Nanak Chand Rattu took the
special pain and put in very hard labour in accomplishing this great task. He
did the whole work of typing etc. Very willingly and without caring for his
health and Mr. Parkash Chand did their job as a token of their greatest love
and affection towards me. Their labour can hardly be repaid. I am very much
grateful to them.
When
I took upon the task of composing this book I was ill and am still ill. During
these five years there were many ups and downs in my health. At some stages my
condition had become so critical that doctors talked of me as a dying flame. The
successful rekindling of the dying flame is due to the medical skill of my wife
and Dr. Malvankar, the physician who has been attending till I completed the
work. I am also thankful to Mr. M.B. Chitnis, who took special interest in
correcting proof and to go through the whole book.
I
may mention that this is one of the three books which will form a set for the
proper understanding of Buddhism. The other two books are – (i) Buddha and Karl
Marx and (ii) Revolution and Counter Revolution in Ancient India. They are
written out in parts. I hope to publish them soon.
B.R.
Ambedkar
5th
December, 1956.
No comments:
Post a Comment