Reevaluating the Neo-Buddhist Movement
The advancement of Hinduism leaves the symbols of Buddhism a residual space and undermines its revolutionary potential.
The followers of Buddhism in India were negligible till 14 October 1956. And as a religion, it was he who was on the verge of extinction. On this date, Babasaheb Ambedkar embraced Buddhism at a grand ceremony in Nagpur, Maharashtra, and offered it to millions of his followers. Significant sections of the then untouchable castes divorced the degraded untouchable caste identity to find solace in the teachings of the Buddha.
Ambedkar’s influence
It was inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi a few days ago on 20 October 2021. Kushinagar International Airport In Uttar Pradesh, which will help in connecting important Buddhist pilgrimage sites. Kushinagar is an important Buddhist pilgrimage site. The Prime Minister declared Buddhist sites and teachings of Buddha as markers of India’s ancient civilizational heritage. However, he never acknowledged Ambedkar’s contribution in reviving Buddhism. Buddhism’s association with the Dalit liberation movement is largely neglected, and often, its ornamental spiritual side is presented instead.
According to the last national population census, Buddhists are one of the smallest minorities (0.7% of the total population) in India. Interestingly, most of them are Dalits from Maharashtra. Within the traditional Hindu social system, the untouchables were reduced to a sub-human category and treated subject to hatred and prejudices. Although there were effective social reforms to correct historical wrongs, the general social psyche of the dominant caste Hindus towards the lowest ranks remained pervasive. With the advent of Ambedkar on the national political stage, the Dalits realized their self-potential and started a struggle claiming an equal share in the modern institutions of power. Adopting Buddhism is declared as an intellectual choice of Dalits which links them to a strong historical past as well as prepares them to enjoy constitutional rights as secular citizens.
a force in maharashtra
Important cities of Maharashtra such as Mumbai, Aurangabad and Nagpur have seen the rise of powerful Dalit movements, social events and modern monuments. Deeksha Bhoomi in Nagpur, where Ambedkar embraced Buddhism, has emerged as a monumental heritage site, attracting lakhs of visitors every year. Here, Buddhism was revived not only as part of India’s cultural and civilizational heritage, but also as a tool to escape caste hierarchical cultural hegemony and social enmity. In the post-Ambedkar period, urban Buddhists—due to their educational achievements and newly attained middle class status—offered significant leadership to Dalit politics and organized various social and cultural struggles. Importantly, it is the constructive application of neo-Buddhist identity and ideology that has structured the Dalit movement as an autonomous political force in Maharashtra. During the growing period of activism by the Dalit Panthers in Bombay, a serious debate broke out between the Neo-Buddhists and the Marxist-Socialists. Namdev Dhasal, a vagabond revolutionary poet, offered a radical political alternative, suggesting that the ‘Dalits’ are a revolutionary group of all oppressed communities and that they would combat caste atrocities and state violence through radical violent means. Dhasal was influenced by the Maoist-Naxalbari movements and wanted the Dalits to forge a close association with the communist working class movement.
Raja Dhale, another founding member of the Dalit Panthers movement, criticized such a ‘leftist turn’ of the Dalit movement. As an alternative to Dhasal’s ‘Marxist Manifesto’, he offered a Buddhist perspective, suggesting that the social justice movement should be based on the primacy of Ambedkarite liberal principles and take a break from the ideas of a violent class struggle. Conversion to Buddhism helped the community to develop a genuine appreciation of the constitutional values of secularism and social justice, and to develop a significant distance from ideologies that legitimize any brutal use of violence. Dhale saw the Neo-Buddhist movement not only as a communal project for the emancipation of the untouchables, but as a revolutionary project that would enlighten the wider Bahujan mass.
Second, the adoption of Buddhism also helped Dalits find a stronger sense of their cultural past. He created Buddhist cultural symbols (monuments, Vihar and religious places), customs and practices (by celebrating Buddhist festivals) as proud markers of their new social identity. Buddhist cultural claims and claims in public places became symbols of their rejection against Hindu cultural hegemony and its social web. Such assertiveness often pits them against right-wing ideologies.
niche ideological space
In Mumbai, under the leadership of Bal Thackeray, the Shiv Sena responded to neo-Buddhist social activism with street violence and riots. In the early 1990s, Neo-Buddhists launched a mass movement to free the Bodh Gaya temple from the control of Brahmin priests and also put a legal claim on the controversial site of the Babri Masjid, thus putting Hindutva politics in a jiffy. Diya – How to deal with it demands of Neo-Buddhists.
Although the Bharatiya Janata Party regime at the center appears more liberal towards Dalit cultural and religious symbols and avoids much clashes on this front, it is difficult to attract neo-Buddhists to the right wing under the Hindutva project. As an ideological force, Neo-Buddhists offer an alternative reading of history and visualize Buddhism as the main challenger to Brahmanical Hindu traditions, the caste system, and orthodox ritual. Thus the Buddhist extremists are separate from the Hindutva hegemony and seek to maintain their autonomy in the socio-cultural spheres.
Non-affiliation with Left extremism and later opposition to Hindutva politics has created a distinct ideological niche for Dalits, especially among neo-Buddhists. However, as a political force, they have failed to pose any significant challenge to the dominant caste and class elite and have failed to organize other marginalized communities as part of their social or political programmes. In more recent times, Neo-Buddhism has produced a passive community specificity that is often associated with ritualistic and spiritual pursuits rather than the creation of influential struggles to gain social justice or political power.
a democratic dialogue
The revolutionary promises made during Ambedkar’s historic Buddhist conversion will be fulfilled only when politics is sensitive to secularism and social justice. The current progress of Hindutva is tremendous and supremacist as it gives residual space to Buddhist symbols and distances itself from its revolutionary anti-caste struggles. While it is important to protect the autonomous cultural space developed by the neo-Buddhist intellectual class, it is equally important to build a unified mass movement to defend the merits of India’s constitutional democracy. Neo-Buddhists can revive Ambedkar’s transformational project only by initiating democratic dialogue with other marginalized and struggling communities.
Harish S. Wankhede Assistant Professor, Center for Political Studies, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
Courtesy : Bharat Times
No comments:
Post a Comment